Charles Dickerson v. Chase Riveland

981 F.2d 1258 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles DICKERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chase RIVELAND, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36064. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Dec. 7, 1992. Before HUG, EUGENE WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Washington State prisoner Charles Dickerson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal on summary judgment of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights suit against various prison officials. Dickerson also appeals the district court's refusal to appoint counsel for him under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 . 3 Dickerson, who is totally blind, alleged that officials of the Washington Corrections Center ("WCC") violated his civil rights when they required him to submit to a urine test for drugs and cited him for an infraction of prison regulations when he failed to provide a urine sample within a prescribed one-hour period. Dickerson seeks removal of the…