Mary Ann Cummins Monteleone v. Municipal Court Ca. County of Solano Northern Solano Judicial District, Anthony S. Monteleone v. Municipal Court Ca. County of Solano Northern Solano Judicial District

Good Law
981 F.2d 1258·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 36552
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 199291-16725California283 words

Opinion

Opinion

981 F.2d 1258 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mary Ann Cummins MONTELEONE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MUNICIPAL COURT CA.; County of Solano Northern Solano Judicial District, et al., Respondents-Appellees. Anthony S. MONTELEONE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MUNICIPAL COURT CA.; County of Solano Northern Solano Judicial District, et al., Respondents-Appellees, Nos. 91-16725, 91-16804. * United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. ** Decided Dec. 8, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Mary Ann Cummins-Monteleone and Anthony S. Monteleone appeal the district court's denial of their 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petitions. They have both been released from custody since the district court denied their petitions, and have only to pay a $60,000 fine to complete their sentences. Because they are not presently in custody and have not demonstrated that they face future custody, this court lacks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.