Donald A. Heggie v. Key Bank of Oregon

981 F.2d 1258 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald A. HEGGIE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KEY BANK OF OREGON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-35703. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1992. * Decided Dec. 3, 1992. Before TANG, BRUNETTI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald Heggie challenged the termination of his employment with Key Bank of Oregon under the Age Discrimination and Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621 , et seq. The jury awarded Heggie $74,798 for lost wages and benefits. Key Bank appeals the district court's denial of its motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and for a new trial. I. Key Bank's motion for JNOV 3 Although Key Bank moved for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff's evidence, Key Bank did not again move for a directed verdict at the close of all evidence, and Key Bank is precluded from seeking JNOV. Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b); Farley Transp. Co. v. Santa…