William James Marsio v. United States

981 F.2d 1258 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William James MARSIO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-16329. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 21, 1992. * Decided Dec. 28, 1992. Before TANG, NOONAN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William James Marsio appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He contends that the district court erred by denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his claims that his confession was coerced and his guilty plea was involuntary. The government contends that Marsio's notice of appeal was untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , and we affirm. 3 Marsio pleaded guilty to making false statements to a federally insured bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , and was sentenced on January 9, 1987, to two years imprisonment, suspended, and five years probation. On May 8, 1987, the district court revoked…