Francisco D. Porras v. Eddie R. Myers Attorney General, State of California

981 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Francisco D. PORRAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie R. MYERS; Attorney General, State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-55503. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. Decided Dec. 11, 1992. 1 Before TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON Circuit Judges. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Francisco D. Porras, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his convictions for conspiracy to possess more than 25 pounds of cocaine for sale, possession of more than 25 pounds of cocaine for sale, and laundering money derived from illegal trafficking of cocaine, in violation of Cal.Penal Code §§ 182(1), 186.10 and Cal.Health and Safety Code §§ 11351, 11352. Porras contends that the state trial court violated the proscription against ex post facto laws when it imposed a ten-year sentencing…