Eric Schroeder v. Edwin Shimoda

981 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eric SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edwin SHIMODA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16737. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 21, 1992. * Decided Dec. 28, 1992. Before TANG, NOONAN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hawaii state prisoner Eric Schroeder appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants prison officials in Schroeder's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Schroeder contends that he was (1) denied due process when he was placed in disciplinary segregation for fighting, and (2) denied access to the courts during the time he was in disciplinary segregation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 "This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the…