United States v. Century Clinic

981 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CENTURY CLINIC, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-15534. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1992. * Decided Dec. 24, 1992. Before KILKENNY, GOODWIN and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER ** 2 Century Clinic, Inc. appeals a district court order affirming a magistrate judge's denial of a Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion for return of property seized. Century Clinic contends that it was denied effective assistance of counsel during the hearing on the motion, and that the district court's order must be reversed in light of the magistrate's allegedly erroneous ruling. We lack jurisdiction to consider Century Clinic's claim. 3 Generally, only final orders are appealable. 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Nevertheless, certain interlocutory orders may be reviewed on appeal. 18 U.S.C. § 3731 . An order granting or denying a Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion for…