United States v. James Wesley Chapman

Good Law
981 F.2d 1259·1992 WL 379409·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 36644
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 199291-50724California3,245 words

Opinion

Opinion

981 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Wesley CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50724. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1992. Decided Dec. 17, 1992. Before D.W. NELSON, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 James Wesley Chapman appeals his conviction for conspiracy to manufacture and possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 & 841(a)(1), possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), manufacture and attempted manufacture of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 & 841(a)(1), and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm the conviction. 3 * Chapman argues that the indictment should have been dismissed because his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.