Ivory Pratt v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, Cmc

981 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ivory PRATT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wayne ESTELLE, Warden, CMC, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-55383. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. * Decided Dec. 11, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ivory Pratt, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and review the denial de novo. Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989). We affirm. Sentence Enhancement 3 Pratt's first contention is that the district court erred in holding that his prior convictions were properly used to enhance his sentence upon conviction for residential burglary, falsely identifying himself to a police officer, and misdemeanor battery. Pratt claims that he was not advised of the privilege against self-incrimination before he admitted…