United States v. Haydee Ceballos Naranjo

981 F.2d 1260 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Haydee Ceballos NARANJO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-55689. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. * Decided Dec. 11, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Haydee Ceballos Naranjo, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate her sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine. Naranjo contends that the district court erred by failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on her section 2255 motion. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990). We review the district court's decision to deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of…