United States v. Steven Goldman

981 F.2d 1260 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven GOLDMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50028. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 10, 1992. * Decided Dec. 17, 1992. Before FERGUSON, CANBY and DAVID K. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steven Goldman pleaded guilty to escaping from the custody of the federal prison camp at La Tuna, Texas, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751 (a), and now appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . Notice of appeal was timely filed. Fed.R.App.P. 4(b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 Application of the Sentencing Guidelines is reviewed de novo. United States v. Kohl, 972 F.2d 294, 297 (9th Cir.1992); United States v. Lawrence, 916 F.2d 553, 554 (9th Cir.1990). 4 Goldman claims the sentencing court erred in its application of…