United States v. Joseph Briant McGee

981 F.2d 1260 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Briant McGEE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50574. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1992. Decided Dec. 16, 1992. 1 Before ALDISERT * CANBY and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendant Joseph McGee appeals his convictions on three counts of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) and (d), and three counts of use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). McGee challenges two evidentiary rulings and the court's refusal to grant his severance motion on the bank robbery counts. He asserts that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to determine whether a juror either saw or heard about a gun not admitted into evidence. McGee also appeals from his enhanced sentence on one firearm count, arguing that multiple convictions in the same…