United States v. Willie Teague

981 F.2d 1260 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie TEAGUE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-16097. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 7, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Willie Teague, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his guilty plea conviction for distribution of PCP in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Teague contends that his guilty plea was invalid because the district court neglected to inform him that he was subject to a term of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, Rodriguera v. United States, 954 F.2d 1465, 1467 (9th Cir.1992), and we vacate and remand to allow Teague an opportunity to replead. 3 Before a trial court accepts a guilty plea, it must inform the defendant of…