United States v. Nelson Resende

981 F.2d 1260 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nelson RESENDE, Defendant-Appellant No. 91-50780. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1992. * Decided Dec. 7, 1992. Before D.W. NELSON, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nelson Resende was convicted by a jury of failure to report transportation of monetary instruments in excess of $10,000 in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5316 (a)(1)(A) and of making a false statement to a government agency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 . On appeal, Resende alleges that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient as a matter of law, and that the district court erred by imposing and failing to modify the sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm both the conviction and sentence. 3 I. Sufficiency of the Evidence Supporting the Verdict 4 In determining whether the evidence presented…