Anthony R. West v. United States Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
981 F.2d 1261·1992 WL 367741·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 36384
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 199292-16056California654 words

Opinion

Opinion

981 F.2d 1261 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony R. WEST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-16056. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. * Decided Dec. 11, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony R. West, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. He contends that he was deprived of his right to due process and equal protection at a prison disciplinary hearing because the prison staff representative assigned to assist him failed to interview a witness and failed to present evidence at the hearing. He challenges the disciplinary segregation and loss of good time imposed as a result of the disciplinary hearing. We review de novo the district court's denial of a habeas petition. Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.