United States v. Robert M. Petty, United States of America v. Melvin L. Dewitt, United States of America v. Pasqual Debraine, United States of America v. Jordan Rodrigues Quintal, Jr.

Good Law
982 F.2d 1365
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 199390-30291California5,199 words

Opinion

Opinion

982 F.2d 1365 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert M. PETTY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin L. DeWITT, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pasqual DEBRAINE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jordan Rodrigues QUINTAL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 90-30291 to 90-30294. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 7, 1992. Decided Jan. 7, 1993. As Amended May 11, 1993. * Richard J. Troberman, James L. Varnell, Ziontz, Chestnut, Varnell, Berley & Slonim, Seattle, WA, Frank J. Ragen, San Diego, CA, and David S. Marshall, Seattle, WA, for defendants-appellants. Jerry Diskin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Seattle, WA, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Before: HUG, NOONAN and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Robert M. Petty, Melvin L. DeWitt, Pasqual Debraine and Jordan Rodrigues Quintal, Jr. challenge the use of a coconspirator's post-arrest statement against them at the sentencing phase of the criminal process. Other issues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.