Tiffany W. v. Miranda H. CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 2022A160948California2,558 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

On June 23, 2020, Tiffany W. filed a request for civil harassment restraining orders (Judicial Council Forms, form CH-100) against Miranda. Tiffany stated that Miranda was a tenant in a building Tiffany manages and that on April 8, 2020, Miranda violated the parties’ civil harassment mediated settlement dated July 17, 2019 (2019 settlement agreement). Tiffany listed two prior Alameda County civil harassment cases Miranda filed against Tiffany in 2019, one of which resulted in the 2019 settlement agreement, which Tiffany attached to her request. The 2019 settlement

1 agreement states that Tiffany and Miranda will “avoid unnecessary communication of all kinds” and that any necessary communications “will be brief, polite and confined to the issue at hand.” It further states: “Whenever possible, communications will be confined to those between [Miranda] and [Dorothy M.].1 When a new assistant manager is hired for the property . . . where [Miranda] resides, the new assistant manager will be available to communicate with [Miranda], if [Dorothy] is not available. Only as a last resort in the case of emergency may communications be between [Miranda] and [Tiffany]. All…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.