People v. Tunstall CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 2022A161231California996 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 1/12/22 P. v. Tunstall CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A161231

ROBERT WILLIAM TUNSTALL,

Defendant and Appellant. (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FC11624)

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Robert William Tunstall appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for resentencing brought pursuant to section 1170.95. As relevant here, Tunstall argues — and the Attorney General concedes — the order must be reversed and the matter remanded for a new hearing under section

We resolve this case by memorandum opinion pursuant to California

Standards of Judicial Administration, section 8.1, reciting only those facts necessary to resolve the issue raised. Undesignated statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.