In Re John Anderson, Debtors. Cyfred, Ltd. v. E.C. Development Company, Party in Interest

Good Law
983 F.2d 1075·1992 WL 389219·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37136
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 31, 199291-15205California543 words

Opinion

Opinion

983 F.2d 1075 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re John ANDERSON, et al., Debtors. CYFRED, LTD., Appellant, v. E.C. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Party in Interest, Appellee. No. 91-15205. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1992. * Decided Dec. 31, 1992. Before WISDOM ** , BEEZER and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 E.C. Development Co. argues that this Court is without jurisdiction to hear this appeal because Cyfred's motion for reconsideration was not timely served and therefore did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal. The district court's decision denying the motion to reopen the bankruptcy estate was entered on August 28, 1990. A motion for reconsideration must be served no more than ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). E.C. Development states that it was served with the motion for reconsideration on September 10, 1990. Excluding the intervening Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.