Raymond Dobard v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California

983 F.2d 1075 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond DOBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16640. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. * Decided Jan. 13, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond Dobard appeals pro se the district court's order denying him leave to file his complaint pursuant to a pre-filing order entered against Dobard in a previous action. The district court found that Dobard's complaint was frivolous. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir.1990). We vacate and remand. 3 Dobard's complaint alleged that he was denied access to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on the basis of physical disability and race.…