Charles Oren Anderson v. Ron Angelone, Department of Prisons Accounting Office and Staff John Does, Jane Does of Prison System

Good Law
983 F.2d 1075·1993 WL 7259·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 5707
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 199392-15695California881 words

Opinion

Opinion

983 F.2d 1075 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles Oren ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron ANGELONE, Department of Prisons Accounting Office and Staff; John Does, Jane Does of Prison system, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15695. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. * Decided Jan. 13, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Charles Oren Anderson, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Tanner v. Heise, 879 F.2d 572, 576 (9th Cir.1989). All allegations of material fact in the complaint are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.