In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Kiewit Companies, Witness-Appellant v. United States

983 F.2d 1076 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION. KIEWIT COMPANIES, Witness-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 92-35291. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1992. Decided Dec. 31, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, HUG and POOLE, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM * Kiewit appeals a district court order denying the return of copies of documents furnished to the government in response to grand jury subpoenas. It also appeals the court's order denying the unsealing of a declaration that accompanied the government's petition for disclosure of those copies to the Justice Department's Civil Division. We affirm. 1 Normally, a grand jury must return all original records to their owner when it completes its task. See, e.g., United States ex rel. Woodard v. Tynan, 776 F.2d 250, 252 (10th Cir.1985) (en banc); Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal Revenue, 406 F.Supp. 1098, 1130…