In re Madson

983 F.2d 1076 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Martin M. MADSON, Debtor, Martin M. MADSON, Appellant, v. Janie MADSON; Peter H. Arkison, Trustee; United States Trustee; H. Michael Fields; Karen L. Herrin, Trustee, Appellees. No. 92-35172. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Jan. 15, 1993. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Martin Madson appeals the district court's denial of his motion to set aside the court's order determining that Madson's wife had a priority claim to homestead funds from the trustee's liquidation of certain real property. Madson contends that the district court erred by dismissing his appeal for lack of diligent prosecution because the district court never considered alternative sanctions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and we affirm. 1 3 We review a "district court's dismissal for non-compliance with…