Krain v. Kahn

Good Law
983 F.2d 1076·1992 WL 354531·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37119
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 199290-56208California2,680 words

Opinion

Opinion

983 F.2d 1076 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence C. KRAIN, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allen KAHN, M.D., et al., Defendants, and Herbert Forman, M.D., Seymour Siegel, M.D., Harold Visotsky, M.D., Irving Kagen, M.D., Jack Berger, M.D., and Leslie Lee, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-56208. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 7, 1991. * Decided Dec. 1, 1992. 1 Before FLETCHER and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and REED, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER *** 3 Plaintiff-Appellant Lawrence S. Krain appeals from a judgement of dismissal entered by the district court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) in favor of the defendants-appellees Herbert Forman, M.D., Seymour Siegel, M.D., Harold Visotsky, M.D., Irving Kagen, M.D., Jack Berger, M.D., and Leslie Lee. Previously, appellant appealed an earlier district court judgment of dismissal of his claims against the defendant doctors. This Court originally affirmed the district court's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.