Johnson v. United States Bureau of Prisons
Opinion
Opinion
983 F.2d 1076 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Martin Allen JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-16388. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1992. Decided Dec. 18, 1992. Before GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Petitioner Martin Allen Johnson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to amend judgment in his habeas corpus petition and of his motion for costs. We affirm the judgment of the district court. I. BACKGROUND 2 Johnson is serving a twenty-two year sentence for possession making threatening statements toward a staff member. Johnson asks that his record be expunged of the violation because he was not permitted to present witnesses nor allowed a staff representative at the disciplinary hearing in violation of due process. The issue was not adequately presented to the district court until after the…