In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Doe). United States of America v. John Doe, and Jack Roe, Intervenor-Appellant

983 F.2d 1076 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS (DOE). UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. John DOE, Respondent, and Jack Roe, Intervenor-Appellant. No. 91-56139. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 8, 1992. Decided Jan. 15, 1993. Before POOLE, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Intervenor-Appellant Jack Roe appeals from the district court's order compelling his attorney to testify before a federal grand jury. He argues that the district court erred in not holding an evidentiary hearing to determine the applicability of the crime-fraud exception. He also argues that the district court erred in not requiring the government to submit a list of questions that it intended to ask the attorney. We have jurisdiction pursuant to the doctrine of Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7 (1918). We affirm the judgment of the district court. BACKGROUND 3 Intervenor-Appellant Jack…