Bernice E. Erwin v. City of Angels Camp, City Council & Planning Commission

983 F.2d 1076 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Bernice E. ERWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ANGELS CAMP, City Council & Planning Commission, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15267. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. * Decided Dec. 14, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bernice E. Erwin appeals pro se the district court's order granting dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint with prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Erwin contends that the district court erred by (1) finding that her action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations and (2) failing to provide adequate notice of the deficiencies in her pleadings and give her an adequate opportunity to amend her complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 * Statute of Limitations 4 We review de novo a district court's dismissal on statute of limitations…