Barry J. Krasner v. Professionals Prototype I Insurance Company Limited

983 F.2d 1076 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8193 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Barry J. KRASNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROFESSIONALS PROTOTYPE I INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-55985. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 9, 1992. Decided Jan. 13, 1993. Before POOLE, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Barry Krasner, a California attorney, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Professionals Prototype I Insurance Company, Ltd. ("Professionals") on his claims that Professionals had a duty to defend him as a defendant and cross-defendant in a civil RICO suit pursuant to the professional liability policy Professionals issued him. We affirm. 3 * Krasner was sued by Fireman's Fund Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company as one of many attorney defendants in a civil RICO case. Specifically, Fireman's Fund and Allstate alleged that a group of…