Ernie R. Sanders v. Rob Roberts, Warden Aura Gonzalez Corrine Gilroy

Good Law
983 F.2d 1077·1993 WL 4814·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 5673
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 199392-55135California1,619 words

Opinion

Opinion

983 F.2d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ernie R. SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rob ROBERTS, Warden; Aura Gonzalez; CORRINE GILROY, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55135. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. * Decided Jan. 12, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ernie R. Sanders, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's partial Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal and summary judgment dismissal of his Bivens action against prison officials. 1 We review de novo. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990). We affirm in part and vacate and remand in part. 3 * Background 4 On April 16, 1990, Sanders filed his civil rights complaint against three employees of the Metropolitan Correctional Center. He alleged that his right of access to the courts was violated by the defendants' restriction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.