Smith v. Sublett
Opinion
Opinion
983 F.2d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joe Clarence SMITH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel SUBLETT, Deputy Warden, Ellis McDougal, Director, Lester Jennings, ADOC, Captain Coonts, Lieutenant Vallier, as Shift Lieutenant of Cell Block 6, CSO II Ontiveros, as Disciplinary Coordinator of Cell Block 6 Search Team; CSO Dowling, as a member of Cell Block 6 Search Team; Carol Scott, CPO I, as a Counselor assigned to wing 3, Cell Block 6, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16506. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 17, 1992. * Decided Jan. 14, 1993. Before GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joe Clarence Smith, an Arizona death row inmate, appeals pro se the grant of summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We reverse the district court with respect to Smith's claim of retaliatory searches and seizures and affirm on all other issues. 3 * Smith is currently in the…