United States v. Hilario Alonso-Quevedo

Good Law
983 F.2d 1077·1993 WL 5177·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 5675
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 199392-50177California450 words

Opinion

Opinion

983 F.2d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hilario ALONSO-QUEVEDO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50177. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. * Decided Jan. 11, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hilario Alonso-Quevedo appeals his sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. The government contends that Alonso-Quevedo waived his right to appeal pursuant to an oral plea agreement. Alonso-Quevedo does not address the issue of his waiver of the right to appeal nor does he allege a breach of the plea agreement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review de novo whether a defendant waived his statutory right to appeal. United States v. Bolinger, 940 F.2d 478, 479 (9th Cir.1991). 4 An…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.