Keith Alan Robbins v. Sam Lewis, Director

983 F.2d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Keith Alan ROBBINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sam LEWIS, Director, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-16052. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. * Decided Dec. 14, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Keith Alan Robbins appeals pro se the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition claiming that the Arizona state court's imposition of a prison term after the revocation of his probation violated the double jeopardy clause. The district court determined that Robbins did not show cause and prejudice for his state procedural default. We review de novo, Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm. 3 "In all cases in which a state prisoner has defaulted his federal claims in state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, federal habeas review of the claims is barred unless the…