Virgil Popescu v. Jack Lalanne Fitness Centers, AKA U.S. Health Incorporated & Bally's Health & Tennis Corporation

983 F.2d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Virgil POPESCU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACK LALANNE FITNESS CENTERS, aka U.S. Health Incorporated & Bally's Health & Tennis Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-55660. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. * Decided Dec. 14, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Virgil Popescu appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his action against Jack LaLanne Fitness Centers pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . See Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir.1984) (dismissal of an action without prejudice is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 ), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1007 (1985). 1 We review de novo the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Clayton v. Republic Airlines, Inc., 716 F.2d 729, 730 (9th Cir.1983), and we…