Rouman v. U.S. I.N.S.

983 F.2d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Georges Maurice Sadak ROUMAN; Mourice Sadak Rouman; Zouzou Sadak Rouman; Wedad Abidel Messeth Attalla Rouman; Mirvat Maurice Rouman, Petitioners, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70431. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 8, 1992. Decided Jan. 4, 1993. Before FEINBERG, * GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The Rouman family petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying their request for asylum and withholding of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a), 1253(h). Petitioner Mirvat Rouman Sbait also appeals the Board's denial of her motion to reopen for consideration of a suspension of deportation claim pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1). We affirm the order of the Board. I. 3 The petitioner family consists of Maurice Rouman, 1 his wife Wedad, his son Georges,…