United States v. Rafael Cuellar-Gallardo, United States of America v. Alfredo Pardo-Martinez, United States of America v. Manuel Loera-Tellez

983 F.2d 1078 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael CUELLAR-GALLARDO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo PARDO-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel LOERA-TELLEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30423 to 91-30425. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. Decided Jan. 15, 1993. Before D.W. NELSON, TROTT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants in this case appeal their convictions for conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) (1984). They contend that the district court improperly excluded impeachment evidence in violation of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause. In addition, Loera-Tellez claims there was insufficient evidence to convict him of conspiracy and possession with intent to…