United States v. Mark S. Elkshoulder

983 F.2d 1078 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark S. ELKSHOULDER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30068. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. * Decided Dec. 14, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark Elkshoulder appeals his conviction following a jury trial for aggravated sexual abuse in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 2241(c). Elkshoulder claims the district court erred by admitting drawings depicting the crime made before trial by the seven-year-old victim at the behest of the victim/witness coordinator. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review for abuse of discretion a district court's ruling to admit evidence over a hearsay objection. United States v. Kirk, 844 F.2d 660, 663 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 890 (1988). An erroneous ruling will not compel reversal if the error was…