United States v. Shirley S. Coble

983 F.2d 1078 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shirley S. COBLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-36049. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 8, 1992. * Decided Jan. 6, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, EUGENE A. WRIGHT and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Coble appeals the district court's denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct her sentence. We review de novo, United States v. Bigman, 906 F.2d 392, 394 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 Coble argues on appeal for the first time that she was not competent to plead guilty because she was taking the drug Tofranil. Normally, this court "will not address on appeal issues not raised in a § 2255 motion and passed upon by the district court." Id. at 395. We decline to do so here. 4 Because Coble's plea was voluntary, intelligent and knowing, we decline to consider her collateral attack on her…