United States v. Sebastian Ramirez, United States of America v. Leopoldo Manzo-Garcia, United States of America v. Perry Wagner

Good Law
983 F.2d 1079·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 5646
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 199391-50671California4,644 words

Opinion

Opinion

983 F.2d 1079 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sebastian RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leopoldo MANZO-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Perry WAGNER, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-50671, 91-50694 and 91-50711. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1992. * Decided Jan. 15, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and TROTT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Sebastian Ramirez, Leopoldo Manzo-Garcia and Perry Wagner appeal their jury convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Manzo-Garcia and Ramirez also appeal their convictions for carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.