United States v. Charles McKay Pullin

983 F.2d 1079 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles McKay PULLIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50311. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1992. Decided Dec. 31, 1992. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and TROTT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Charles Pullin appeals his jury conviction for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a) and (d) (1988) and his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines. 3 We affirm. I. SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE 4 Pullin contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a finding that he was the person who robbed the bank because there were no definitive identifications of him as the robber. The Government presented convincing evidence that Pullin was the robber and that there was proper identification of him. 5 The record contains sufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to have concluded…