United States v. Wesley R. McKinney

983 F.2d 1079 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wesley R. MCKINNEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-56154. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. * Decided Dec. 14, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Wesley McKinney appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States in its civil action to recover a $50,000 civil money penalty the government assessed against McKinney. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's summary judgment, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 McKinney was a director of Republic Bancorporation, Inc. ("Republic"). On October 26, 1983, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("Board") issued a cease and desist…