United States v. James David Wilson, United States of America v. James David Wilson

983 F.2d 1080 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James David WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James David WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 90-50060, 90-50115. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. * Decided Jan. 11, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated cases, James Wilson appeals from his sentences imposed following guilty pleas to five counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Wilson was indicted and convicted for robberies which occurred in separate jurisdictions, and he contends that the district court abused its discretion by imposing consecutive sentences after his convictions had been consolidated for sentencing. Wilson argues that the district court should have calculated a single combined offense level for all five counts of…