United States v. Tyrone Williams
Opinion
Opinion
983 F.2d 1080 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50300. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1992. * Decided Dec. 30, 1992. Before CHOY, SNEED and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tyrone Williams appeals his sentence for forging an endorsement on a United States Treasury check in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 510 (a)(1). He contends the district court erroneously failed to consider that the Sentencing Guidelines permitted the court simultaneously to reduce his offense level for accepting responsibility and to enhance it for obstructing justice if the court found Williams' case to be extraordinary. There is no need for us to reach this contention raised for the first time on appeal, however, because the record supports the district court's determination that Williams should not receive a reduction for acceptance of responsibility.…