Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 741·984 F.2d 283·23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20546·35 ERC (BNA) 2028·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 383
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 199391-16435California2,614 words

Opinion

Opinion

984 F.2d 283 35 ERC 2028 , 61 USLW 2441 , 23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,546 FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; Daniel McGovern, in his official capacity as Regional Administrator of Region IX, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16435. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1992. Decided Jan. 15, 1993. Carolyn B. Kuhl, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. J. Carol Williams, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation ("Fairchild") seeks declaratory relief and enforcement of a Consent Order issued under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9606 . The district court dismissed Fairchild's complaint for want of subject matter jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (h) ("Timing of Review"). We affirm. BACKGROUND 2 On August 15, 1985, Fairchild, Raytheon Company, and Intel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.