Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Opinion
Opinion
984 F.2d 283 35 ERC 2028 , 61 USLW 2441 , 23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,546 FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; Daniel McGovern, in his official capacity as Regional Administrator of Region IX, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16435. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1992. Decided Jan. 15, 1993. Carolyn B. Kuhl, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. J. Carol Williams, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation ("Fairchild") seeks declaratory relief and enforcement of a Consent Order issued under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9606 . The district court dismissed Fairchild's complaint for want of subject matter jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (h) ("Timing of Review"). We affirm. BACKGROUND 2 On August 15, 1985, Fairchild, Raytheon Company, and Intel…