United States v. Kent Borden Rogers

Bad Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 976·984 F.2d 314·1993 WL 9700·71 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1985·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 932
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 199391-50090California2,450 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

Rogers pled guilty to mail fraud and was sentenced to eight years imprisonment and ordered to pay $70.7 million in restitution. The government concedes that the imposition of restitution was improper, but the parties disagree on the proper remedy. Rogers also contends that his plea was coerced by the imposition of an IRS jeopardy assessment. We vacate Rogers’ sentence and remand for resentencing or, at the discretion of the district court, for the withdrawal of Rogers’ guilty plea.

I

In April 1988, the IRS brought a jeopardy assessment against Rogers and his company for alleged tax deficiencies for the years 1983 and 1984. Rogers claims that the jeopardy assessment tied up nearly all of his assets.

On May 10, 1989, Rogers, along with others, was indicted on mail fraud charges. On February 26, 1990, Rogers pled guilty to two counts of mail fraud. The plea agreement was silent on the subject of restitution. When Rogers entered his guilty plea, the district court did not discuss with him the possibility of restitution. Rogers was sentenced on October 22, 1990 to eight years in prison and was ordered to pay $70.7 million in restitution to Bank of America.

In December 1990, the IRS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.