Fontaine Davis v. City And County Of San Francisco

Good Law
984 F.2d 345·60 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,054·61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 457·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 1842·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 916
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 199391-15113California236 words

Opinion

Opinion

984 F.2d 345 61 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 457 , 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,054 , 61 USLW 2498 Fontaine DAVIS; Eric H. Washington; Jerilyn North, Jimmie Braden, Audrey Lee, Early Davis, Brandi Swanson, Susan Moorehead, Anne Young, Mary M. Carder, Theresa Rodigou, Kathleen J. Bradshaw, Patricia Murray, International Association of Black Firefighters-San Francisco Chapter, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-15113. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 5, 1993. Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND VACATING PORTION OF OPINION 2 Prior report: 9th Cir., 976 F.2d 1536 . ORDER 3 Plaintiffs-Appellees' petition for rehearing is denied. 4 However, in light of the parties' settlement of plaintiff-appellees' claims to expert witness fees while the court had under consideration whether to take en banc the issue of retroactivity of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 which amended 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) to provide explicitly for the award of expert fees as part of costs, we vacate as moot that portion of the opinion that affirms the district court's award of expert…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.