Elder v. Holloway

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 1205·984 F.2d 991·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 1204·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 604
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 199391-35146California7,997 words

Opinion

Opinion

984 F.2d 991 Charles K. ELDER; Beverly S. Elder, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. R.D. HOLLOWAY; Other Unknown Employees and/or Agents, individually and in their official capacity as police officers for the Ada County Sheriff's Office, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35146. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 27, 1993. Prior Report: 975 F.2d 1388 . John Charles Lynn, Lynn, Scott & Hackney, Boise, ID, for plaintiffs-appellants. James J. Davis, Boise, ID, for defendants-appellees. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 The panel has voted to deny appellants' petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. 2 The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.R.App.P. 35. 3 The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED. 4 KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges PREGERSON, NORRIS, REINHARDT and TROTT join, dissenting from the order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.