City of Santa Clara v. Watkins

Good Law
984 F.2d 1008
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 199391-15168California3,659 words

Opinion

Opinion

984 F.2d 1008 Util. L. Rep. P 13,926 CITY OF SANTA CLARA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cities of Palo Alto, Redding, Roseville, Biggs, and Gridley; Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative; and Shasta Dam Area Public Utility District, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, v. James D. WATKINS, Secretary of Energy; United States Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration; and William Clagett, Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration, Defendants-Appellants, Arvin-Edison Water Storage District; Banta-Carbona Irrigation District; Byron-Bethany Irrigation District; Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District; James Irrigation District; San Luis Obispo Water District; West Side Irrigation District; West Stanislaus Irrigation District; Trinity County Public Utilities District; Hayfork Valley Public Utility District; Calaveras Public Power Agency; Tuolumne County Public Power Agency; Bureau of Electricity of the City of Alameda; and the Cities of Lodi, Lompoc, Ukiah and Healdsburg, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. No. 91-15168. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 16, 1992. Decided Jan. 28, 1993. Margot de Ferranti (argued) and C. Max Vassanelli,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.