Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Peoples Church Of Fresno

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 1315·985 F.2d 446·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 1256·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 652
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 199390-16213California2,661 words

Opinion

Opinion

985 F.2d 446 STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PEOPLES CHURCH OF FRESNO, a California corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-16213. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued Dec. 6, 1991. Submission deferred Dec. 27, 1991. Resubmitted: Jan. 15, 1993. Decided Jan. 28, 1993. George E. Murphy, Bolling, Walter & Gawthrop, Sacramento, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. John Enscoe, Landels, Ripley & Diamond, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Standard Fire Insurance Company and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (collectively referred to as "insurers" or "appellants") brought an action against their insured, Peoples Church of Fresno, seeking a declaration that they have no duty to defend or indemnify Peoples Church in two underlying actions and that they are entitled to reimbursement of defense costs already paid. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court ruled in favor of Peoples…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.