Onesio Chavez v. United States

985 F.2d 571 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Onesio CHAVEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-56463. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. * Decided Jan. 13, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Onesio Chavez, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Chavez challenged his sentence on the grounds of government misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel. Chavez was convicted of conspiring to possess, and possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846, and aiding and abetting, 18 U.S.C. § 2 . We review de novo, Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989), and affirm. 3 Chavez argues that the government falsely led his attorney to…