Delbert Brown v. Southern California Rapid Transit District

985 F.2d 571 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Delbert BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-55712. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 27, 1993. * Decided Feb. 2, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Delbert Brown appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in his action against the Southern California Rapid Transit District (RTD) alleging employment discrimination, wrongful termination of employment, and a violation of his First Amendment rights. Brown contends that the district court erred by finding that he was properly served with RTD's motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment "to determine whether, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, there are…